Comparisons
Side-by-side comparisons
Head-to-head comparisons of named suppliers, platforms and models. These are the pages no individual vendor will write, because each one names its competitors. We hold no manufacturing stake in the outcome, which is the only reason we can publish them.
| Page | Type | Sources | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organ-on-chip platforms compared: Emulate, MIMETAS, CN Bio and six others Eight organ-on-chip platforms against throughput, perfusion mechanism, membrane versus scaffold-free architecture, imaging compatibility, open versus closed consumables and published tissue models. No vendor publishes consumable pricing, that column is honestly empty. | Comparison | 9 | 2026-09-01 |
| Organ-on-chip vs Transwell vs static culture: a decision matrix Three culture architectures compared on physiological relevance, cost per data point, throughput and hands-on time, including an explicit account of when a Transwell insert is the right and cheaper answer, which is more often than the field admits. | Comparison | 8 | 2026-09-01 |
| 3D skeletal muscle models compared: device, cell source, force readout and cost per data point A comparison matrix of 3D skeletal muscle models, Curi Bio Mantarray, eNUVIO OMEGA-MP, Duke myobundles, myriamed myrPlate and myrTissue-Skeletal, and CYTOO MyoScreen, on cell source, device, force readout, maturation time, throughput and cost per data point, with published force figures. | Comparison | 9 | 2026-09-01 |
| 3D tissue model suppliers compared: what ships, what is custom, and what it costs A comparison of fourteen 3D tissue model suppliers, MatTek, EPISKIN, InSphero, MIMETAS, Emulate, CN Bio, TissUse, Altis, Visikol, Xellar, Phenion, J-TEC, myriamed and eNUVIO, on tissue types, format, whether they ship finished tissue or an empty device, custom capability and published price band. | Comparison | 17 | 2026-09-01 |
| Cell banking providers compared: commercial, institutional and the quote-only wall A head-to-head of cell banking providers, WiCell, Cook MyoSite, uBriGene, Curi Bio and named institutional cores, on published price, what is included in the release panel, grade, turnaround, deposit-for-distribution options and who owns the resulting bank. | Comparison | 8 | 2026-09-01 |
| Contract differentiation providers compared: who will actually hand you the cells A head-to-head of contract iPSC differentiation providers, Curi Bio, Ncardia, Axol, bit.bio, Cook MyoSite, eNUVIO and FUJIFILM CDI, on lineages, whose line they will work on, published acceptance criteria, timelines, engagement models and the question that decides the purchase: whether the deliverable is cells or a report. | Comparison | 10 | 2026-09-01 |
| EpiDerm vs SkinEthic RHE vs EPiTRI: reconstructed human epidermis compared A head-to-head of the validated reconstructed human epidermis models, barrier function and ET-50 acceptance ranges, protocol parameters, OECD TG 439 and TG 431 validation status, formats, lead time and what is actually published about price. | Comparison | 11 | 2026-09-01 |
| iPSC astrocyte suppliers compared, head to head An even-handed head-to-head of human iPSC-derived astrocyte suppliers, price per million, published functional evidence, co-culture protocol support, disease panels, isogenic partners and licence posture, with the co-culture ratio the literature actually used and a note on where primary astrocytes still win. | Comparison | 11 | 2026-09-01 |
| iPSC neuron suppliers compared, head to head A head-to-head of the main human iPSC-derived neuron suppliers, price per million, purity specification, subtype breadth, line provenance, published electrophysiology, licensing and minimum order, with a clear statement of where each one is strongest. | Comparison | 10 | 2026-09-01 |
| Liver model suppliers compared: spheroids, perfused chips, hepatocytes and cell lines A head-to-head of human liver model suppliers, InSphero 3D InSight, MatTek HUREL micro livers, CN Bio PhysioMimix perfused plates, HepaRG and bit.bio ioHepatocytes, on model architecture, donor pooling, longevity, format, published price and what each route actually costs per data point. | Comparison | 11 | 2026-09-01 |
| MEA platforms compared: electrode counts, recording channels and per-well economics A head-to-head of the five multielectrode array platform families, Axion Maestro, MaxWell MaxOne and MaxTwo, Multi Channel Systems, 3Brain CorePlate and Alpha MED MED64, on electrodes per well, simultaneous recording channels, plate reuse, published cell-product protocol support and the per-well economics no vendor will publish. | Comparison | 17 | 2026-09-01 |
| Microfluidic fabricators compared: method, feature size, tolerance, MOQ and NRE A head-to-head of named microfluidic fabricators, HiComp, Parallel Fluidics, eNUVIO, FlowJEM, Blue BioDevice, uFluidix, microfluidic ChipShop, Potomac Photonics, ALine and an academic cleanroom, on fabrication method, material, minimum feature size, published tolerances, minimum order quantity, non-recurring engineering cost and who keeps the tooling. | Comparison | 14 | 2026-09-01 |
| Skeletal myoblast sources compared: primary, iPSC-derived and immortalised A head-to-head of the three routes to human myogenic progenitors, primary from Cook MyoSite, PromoCell and Lonza, iPSC-derived from iXCells, bit.bio and myriamed, and immortalised lines, on price per million, purity marker, passage window, donor authenticity, disease panels and what each route costs you scientifically. | Comparison | 12 | 2026-09-01 |
Need the number for your specification
These pages carry published list prices and supplier capabilities. A quotation against your actual specification is a different number, and we will source it.